[解析]
(1)细节理解题。根据第一段"I think this enthusiastic and sometimes childish and blind pushing toward the more technology the better,the more websites the better teacher,and so forth,is very dangerous — is,indeed,self﹣destructive," he indicates.("我认为这种狂热的、有时幼稚的、盲目的追求技术越多越好,网站越多老师越好等等,是非常危险的——实际上是自毁的,"他指出)可知,Hans Ulrich Gumbrecht关心的问题是学生对电子媒体教学技术的过度依赖。故选B。
(2)推理判断题。根据第三段中In any case,knowledge transmission should not be the core function of the university he maintains,noting that universities should be places where people deal with open questions,places for "intellectual complexity" and "riskfill thinking".(在任何情况下,知识传播都不应该是大学的核心功能,他指出,大学应该是人们处理开放性问题的地方,是"智力复杂性"和"充满风险的思维"的地方)以及第四段中Challenges with complexity are what expands your mind.It is something like intellectual gymnastics.And this is what makes you a suitable member of the society.(复杂的挑战能拓展你的思维。这有点像智力体操。这就是让你成为这个社会合适成员的原因)可推知,Gumbercht教授可能同意大学教育应该让学生为社会的全面生活做好准备。故选C。
(3)细节理解题。根据最后一段Discussions in the physical presence have the power of being the catalyst (催化剂) for such intellectual breakthroughs.(现场讨论能成为智力突破的催化剂)可知,根据文章所述,在他人在场的情况下进行讨论可以成为质变的催化剂。故选B项。
(4)标题归纳题。根据文章开头University educators largely think highly of the wonders of teaching through technology,but experts question whether something is lost when professors and lecturers rely too heavily on electronic media or when interaction with students takes place remotely — in cyberspace rather than the real space of the classroom. (大学的教育者们高度评价通过科技所带来的教学奇迹,但是有怀疑者提出质疑,当教授和讲课过度依赖电子媒体,或者和学生的互动是通过网络而不是真实的教室空间远距离发生时,是否失去了某些东西)以及文章结尾谈到教室内教学的优势The possibility of in﹣classroom teaching — of letting something happen which cannot happen if you teach by the transmission of information — is a strength (课堂教学的可能性——通过传递信息的方式进行教学,可以让一些不可能发生的事情发生——是一种优势)可知,文章主要讲述网络教学虽然是可以带来教学奇迹,但是过度的依赖网络教学其实是在毁灭学生们,而传统教学依旧具有它的优势,如和别人现场讨论可以产生一定的智力突破的能力。由此可知,B选项"Traditional Teaching Has Its Place(传统教学有它的一席之地)"适合作本文最佳标题。故选B。