[解析]
(1)目的意图题。由第二段It's an example of how we often rely on intuitive (直觉的) responses—answers we feel are true.People give answers that "pop into their mind",says Steven Sloman.We don't spend much time "reflecting and checking whether the answer is right or wrong.(这是一个例子,说明我们经常依赖直觉的回答,我们觉得答案是正确的。史蒂文•斯洛曼表示,人们给出的答案"突然出现在脑海中"。我们没有花太多时间"反思和检查答案是对还是错"。)可知,作者用球拍和球的例子是来说明人们倾向于匆忙下结论。故选A。
(2)词义猜测题。由第三段But "the trick with fake news is to know to verify"—in other words,to stop and question what you know. (但"假新闻的诀窍是知道要verify"——换言之,停下并质疑你所知道的。)可知,识别假新闻的诀窍是要去质疑你所知道的事情,即确认某事的真假,故划线词的意思是"确定某事是真的"。A.To follow your intuitive sense.跟随你的直觉;B.To confirm something is true 确认某事是真的;C.To consider something seriously认真考虑某事;D.To speak out the understanding about something说出对某事的理解。故选B。
(3)细节理解题。由第三段They told a group of volunteers about it,but admitted they could not fully explain what it was.They then asked the volunteers to rate their own understanding of helium rain.Most volunteers rated themselves 1 out of 7,meaning they did not understand the concept. (他们把这件事告诉了一组志愿者,但承认他们无法完全解释这是什么。然后,他们要求志愿者对自己对氦雨的理解进行评分。大多数志愿者给自己的评分是7分中的1分,这意味着他们不理解这个概念。)和第四段This time,they said that scientists could fully explain how it works.When asked to rate their understanding,the volunteers gave an average answer of 2.The scientists' confidence gave the volunteers an increased sense of their own understanding,Sloman says. (这一次,他们表示,科学家可以充分解释它是如何工作的。当被要求对他们的理解程度进行评分时,志愿者给出的平均答案是2。斯洛曼说,科学家的信心使志愿者对自己的理解感增强。)可知,当志愿者相信科学家能理解氦雨的时候,更多的志愿者声称了解氦雨。故选B项。
(4)推理判断题。根据倒数第二段We are naturally more likely to believe things that confirm our existing opinions. (我们自然更有可能相信证实我们现有观点的东西。)可知,动机推理就是我们自然更有可能相信证实我们现有观点的东西,D选项:You believe a damaging story about someone who you always judge negatively.(你相信一个你总是负面评价的人的坏故事。)为动机推理的典型例子。故选D项。