[解析]
(1)D.根据文章第一段These plants'egg﹣killing abilities have been documented since at least the 1980s,but a new study shows they appear in just a few closely related plants in this family﹣﹣and they are triggered only by certain butterfly species. (这些植物杀死卵子的能力至少从20世纪80年代就有了记载,但一项新的研究表明,它们只出现在这个家族中少数近亲植物中﹣﹣而且只由特定的蝴蝶物种触发)可知,NinaFatouros的研究缩小了植物与蝴蝶相互作用的范围。D.It narrowed down the range of the plant﹣butterfly interaction.(它缩小了植物﹣蝴蝶相互作用的范围)正确。故选D.
(2)A.推理判断题。根据文章第二段First,they dabbed the plants'leaves with liquid that had been exposed to egg material from a butterfly species known to lay eggs on them.Four closely related plant species reliably killed off the treated leaf patches. (首先,他们将接触过一种蝴蝶卵的液体涂在植物的叶子上,这种蝴蝶知会在植物上产卵。四种密切相关的植物确实杀死了处理过的叶斑)"可知,第2段中提到的特殊液体用于植物的叶子,看它们是否会牺牲叶子。A.To see whether they would sacrifice their leaves.(看他们是否愿意牺牲他们的叶子)正确。故选A.
(3)B.观点判断题。根据文章第三段"It's very unlikely that you find this by coincidence," says University of Sheffield molecular plant biologist Jurrian Ton,who was not involved in the study.He adds that the plants' relatedness,coupled with their exaggerated reaction to these butterflies,suggests a heated evolutionary "arms race" took place between the plants and insects. (谢菲尔德大学的分子植物生物学家Jurriaan Ton没有参与这项研究,他说:"这不大可能是巧台。"他补充道,植物之间的亲缘关系,加上它们对这些蝴蝶的夸张反应,表明植物和昆虫之间发生了一场激烈的进化军备竞赛)可知,Jurriaan Ton用幽默诙谐的话表达了自己认为这个发现不太可能是巧合。由此可知,他对于这项新的研究持赞成的态度。A.Indifferent漠不关心的;B.Approving赞成的;C.Disapproving 不赞成的:D.Skeptical持怀疑态度的。故选B.
(4)C.标题判断题。根据文章第一段These plants'egg﹣killing abilities have been documented since at least the 1980s,but a new study shows they appear in just a few closely related plants in this family﹣and they are triggered only by certain butterfly species. (这些植物杀死卵子的能力至少从20世纪80年代就有了记载,但一项新的研究表明,它们只出现在这个家族中少数近亲植物中﹣﹣而且只由特定的蝴蝶物种触发)可知,文章主要讲述了有几种植物会强制沾染了虫子的叶子死亡以保护自己这件事。C.Killer leaves emerge from plant﹣butterfly arms race (植物和蝴蝶军备竞赛中出现的杀手叶子)符合做文章标题。故选C.