[解析]
(1)推理判断题。根据第二段One of the reasons is that even artists have shortcomings.Like any other human being,an artist can make mistakes,and we cannot be severely judgmental of every person that falls into error.Cancel culture with endless criticism is concerned more with how we should disregard the artists when they make mistakes than with how their weakness can be used by the artists to create art that is unique.(其中一个原因是,即使是艺术家也有缺点。像任何其他人一样,艺术家也会犯错误,我们不能对每一个犯错误的人都严厉地评判。充斥着无尽批评的封杀文化更关心的是,当艺术家犯错时,我们应该如何忽视他们,而不是艺术家如何利用他们的弱点来创造独特的艺术。)和第三段中Perhaps Kevin Hart's words support this thought.(也许凯文•哈特的话支持了这种想法)可知,上文提出艺术家也会犯错误,我们不能对每一个犯错误的人都严厉地评判,而是应当关注艺术家如何利用他们的弱点来创造独特的艺术。Kevin Hart赞同这种想法,所有他也会赞成"艺术家的缺点可能就是他们的灵感"的说法。故选C。
(2)细节理解题。根据第四段中Since canceling artists based on their worldview would mean the reception to their art will suffer,artists become tense and unwilling to express themselves,which will kill creativity,eventually leading to the death of art.(因为世界观而取消艺术家,就意味着艺术的接受会受到影响,艺术家会变得紧张,不愿意表达自己,这就会扼杀创造力,最终导致艺术的死亡。)可知,"封杀文化"会导致艺术的死亡是因为它会让艺术家将失去表达和创造的欲望。故选D。
(3)细节理解题。根据最后一段中While these artists may engage in their terrible behavior,the art they produce today may serve as an example for others to produce outstanding work in the future.(虽然这些艺术家可能会做出他们可怕的行为,但他们今天创作的艺术作品可能会成为未来其他人创作杰出作品的榜样。)可知,一个犯了错误的艺术家的艺术可能会给其他人带来艺术创作的灵感,从而给其它人带来益处。故选A。
(4)标题归案题。通读全文,结合第一段中 The question of whether it is possible to separate the artist from their work has been debated for a long time.Even though positive critical reviews about an artist's behavior can improve their artistic achievements,people should treat artists as individuals who have lived apart from their work.(是否有可能将艺术家与他们的作品分开的问题已经争论了很长时间。尽管对艺术家行为的正面评论可以提高他们的艺术成就,但人们应该把艺术家视为与作品分离的个体。)和最后一段Good art should,therefore,be judged due to its value and not the value of the artist.(因此,评判优秀艺术作品的标准应该是它的价值,而不是艺术家的价值)可知,文章第一段中提出观点:应该把艺术家视为与作品相分离的个体。文章最后总结:评判优秀艺术作品的标准应该是作品的价值,而不是艺术家的价值,再次强调应该把艺术家与作品分开评价。所以B项"将艺术与艺术家分开"是最佳标题。故选B。