[解析]
(1)细节理解题。根据第三段Putting aside their eyeglasses,Lacaton and Vassal could not be more different from an earlier generation of Pritzker winners,known for their easily recognizable styles and grand work.(抛开眼镜不谈,Lacaton和Vassal与前一代的普利茨克获奖者没有什么相同,他们以易于识别的风格和宏大的作品而闻名)可知,作者是在以戏谑的口气强调这两位获奖者和其他的普利策奖得主之间除了那副眼镜有点相似外,就没有其他的共同点。故选D项。
(2)细节理解题。根据第四段Their solution was to replace the folding wooden front door with sliding glass door to each unit and painted the ugly walls with something bright.(他们的解决方案是将每个单元的折叠木门换成滑动玻璃门,并将丑陋的墙壁涂上明亮的颜色)可知,他们只是重新设计了大门及重新粉刷了墙壁。故选C项。
(3)推理判断题。根据第三段Instead,the two apply their simple guideline to their work on old urban buildings for low﹣income families:Never destroy,never remove or replace,always add,transform,and reuse!(相反,两人将他们的简单指导方针应用于低收入家庭的旧城市建筑:永远不要破坏、永远不要拆除或更换,永远要添加、改造和再利用!)及第七段There's a lot of violence in architecture and urbanism.We try to be precise.We try to work with kindness,'Lacaton once explained.(建筑和城市化中有很多暴力。我们尽量做到准确。Lacaton曾解释说:"我们努力以善意工作。")可推断,他们很可能是因城市旧房改造理念中的人文关怀而获奖的。故选D项。
(4)文章出处题。由文章第一段Anne Lacaton and Jean﹣Phippe Vassal,this year's Pritzker Prize winners,were as surprised as anyone else when the most famous award in architecture was made public yesterday.(安妮•拉卡顿(Anne Lacaton)和让•菲普•瓦萨尔(Jean Phippe Vassal)是今年的普利茨克奖(Pritzker Prize)获得者,当这个最著名的建筑奖昨天公布时,他们和其他人一样感到惊讶)以及后文可知,本文主要介绍了Anne Lacaton及Jean﹣PhilippeVassal的城市旧房改造理念,因此很可能出现在报纸的"建筑"版面。故选A项。